Under the guiding concepts ‘pluralization’ and ‘authority’, the series presents studies [of the Munich Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 573] on the Early Modern Age from the 15th to the 17th century. Increasingly, the cultural sciences recognize the Early Modern Age as an epoch that was dependent on the exigencies of medieval tradition, but at the same time created the preconditions for the transition of ‘Old Europe’ to the Modern Age. In contrast to the established historical grand narratives of modernization, secularization and progress, the dynamics of the epoch is conceived in the volumes of the series as complex, mutually competing world views, knowledge resources, norms and behavior patterns showing no clear direction. This interdisciplinary series explores the fundamental dynamics of this epoch from the perspectives of literature and linguistics, history, philosophy, and art, music and legal history.

Under the guiding concepts ‘pluralization’ and ‘authority’, the series presents studies [of the Munich Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 573] on the Early Modern Age from the 15th to the 17th century. Increasingly, the cultural sciences recognize the Early Modern Age as an epoch that was dependent on the exigencies of medieval tradition, but at the same time created the preconditions for the transition of ‘Old Europe’ to the Modern Age. In contrast to the established historical grand narratives of modernization, secularization and progress, the dynamics of the epoch is conceived in the volumes of the series as complex, mutually competing world views, knowledge resources, norms and behavior patterns showing no clear direction. This interdisciplinary series explores the fundamental dynamics of this epoch from the perspectives of literature and linguistics, history, philosophy, and art, music and legal history.

Under the guiding concepts ‘pluralization’ and ‘authority’, the series presents studies [of the Munich Collaborative Research Center (SFB) 573] on the Early Modern Age from the 15th to the 17th century. Increasingly, the cultural sciences recognize the Early Modern Age as an epoch that was dependent on the exigencies of medieval tradition, but at the same time created the preconditions for the transition of ‘Old Europe’ to the Modern Age. In contrast to the established historical grand narratives of modernization, secularization and progress, the dynamics of the epoch is conceived in the volumes of the series as complex, mutually competing world views, knowledge resources, norms and behavior patterns showing no clear direction. This interdisciplinary series explores the fundamental dynamics of this epoch from the perspectives of literature and linguistics, history, philosophy, and art, music and legal history.

Unter den Leitbegriffen ‚Pluralisierung‘ und ‚Autorität‘ präsentiert die Reihe Studien (des Münchner Sonderforschungsbereichs 573) zur Frühen Neuzeit vom 15. bis 17. Jahrhundert. Zunehmend erkennen die Kulturwissenschaften die Frühe Neuzeit als eine Epoche, die einerseits noch von den Traditionsvorgaben des Mittelalters abhängig ist, andererseits aber die Voraussetzungen für den Übergang ‚Alteuropas‘ zur Moderne schafft. Die interdisziplinär angelegte Reihe erkundet in literatur- und sprachwissenschaftlicher, historischer, philosophischer, kunst-, musik- und rechtsgeschichtlicher Perspektive diese grundlegende Dynamik der Epoche.

Unter den Leitbegriffen ‚Pluralisierung‘ und ‚Autorität‘ präsentiert die Reihe Studien (des Münchner Sonderforschungsbereichs 573) zur Frühen Neuzeit vom 15. bis 17. Jahrhundert. Zunehmend erkennen die Kulturwissenschaften die Frühe Neuzeit als eine Epoche, die einerseits noch von den Traditionsvorgaben des Mittelalters abhängig ist, andererseits aber die Voraussetzungen für den Übergang ‚Alteuropas‘ zur Moderne schafft. Die interdisziplinär angelegte Reihe erkundet in literatur- und sprachwissenschaftlicher, historischer, philosophischer, kunst-, musik- und rechtsgeschichtlicher Perspektive diese grundlegende Dynamik der Epoche.